Card Know How

Navigating the Skies: Unraveling Go-Rounds and Rejected Landings

Title: Exploring Aircraft Procedures: Go-Rounds vs. Rejected LandingsImagine being inside an aircraft during landing when suddenly the pilot increases thrust and pulls up the nose.

Is it a missed approach or a rejected landing? In this article, we will delve into the distinction between a go-round and a rejected landing, shedding light on the crucial factors that determine the course of action.

Additionally, we will explore the step-by-step procedure of a go-round and discuss the reasons behind initiating this maneuver. So buckle up as we embark on a fascinating journey through aviation protocol, aimed at enlightening and educating readers.

Differentiating between a Go-Round and a Rejected Landing

The Crash that Led to the Distinction

In aviation history, a tragic event occurred that highlighted the need for differentiating between go-rounds and rejected landings. By examining this crash, we can better understand the consequences of confusion during pivotal moments.

The crash served as a wake-up call for the aviation industry, paving the way for enhanced safety procedures.

Flare Mode and its Impact on Go-Round and Rejected Landing Procedures

Flare mode is a critical phase during landing where the pilot prepares for touchdown. Understanding the implications of this mode on go-round and rejected landing procedures will help us appreciate the factors that prompt pilots to act swiftly.

By unraveling the roles and limitations of flare mode, we can grasp the intricacies involved in distinguishing between the two maneuvers.

Go-Round Procedure

Steps Involved in a Go-Round

Initiating a go-round involves a series of well-coordinated actions on the part of the flight crew. We will explore the key steps, including the activation of TOGA (Takeoff/Go-Around) buttons, retracting flaps, and establishing climb thrust.

By comprehending these sequential actions, readers will gain insight into the precision and efficiency required during a go-round.

Reasons for Initiating a Go-Round

Various factors can necessitate a go-round, ensuring the safety and well-being of passengers and crew. From adverse wind conditions and obscured runway edges to compromised touchdown zones or low visibility due to fog or clouds, multiple scenarios can prompt pilots to abort a landing attempt.

Additionally, the potential threat of runway incursion can swiftly shift priorities, making a go-round the most prudent decision. In conclusion, differentiating between a go-round and a rejected landing is pivotal in ensuring the safety of aviation operations.

By closely examining the events that led to this distinction and understanding the go-round procedure and its triggers, we gain valuable insights into the meticulous nature of flight operations. Be it the precise steps involved or the reasons behind initiating a go-round, every aspect contributes to piloting excellence and passenger safety.

Next time you find yourself on a flight, you can rest assured knowing that pilots are well-versed in these protocols, prioritizing your safety above all else.

Rejected Landing Procedure

Steps Involved in a Rejected Landing

When the decision is made to abort a landing, pilots must execute a rejected landing procedure with precision and speed. This series of actions ensures a safe transition from a landing attempt to climbing back into the air.

The steps involved in a rejected landing can be summarized as follows:

1. Manual Control and Autothrottle Disconnection: As soon as a rejected landing is initiated, the pilot takes manual control of the aircraft, disconnecting the autothrottle.

This allows for finer control over thrust and speed during the maneuver. 2.

Thrust Increase and Releasing Brakes: The pilot increases thrust to go around power, simultaneously releasing the brakes to ensure a smooth acceleration and a timely climb. 3.

Retraction of Flaps: While accelerating, the pilot retracts the flaps gradually, reducing the aircraft’s drag. This helps achieve a more efficient climb, enhancing safety and minimizing the risk of stalling.

4. Positive Climb: Once the aircraft reaches a safe speed and altitude, the pilot establishes a positive climb.

This provides the necessary clearance from the runway and ensures a steady ascent to a safe altitude.

Factors That May Lead to a Rejected Landing

A variety of factors can prompt pilots to perform a rejected landing, prioritizing the safety of passengers, crew, and the aircraft. Understanding these factors helps us appreciate the need for diligent decision-making and swift action.

Some common situations that may lead to a rejected landing include:

1. Tailwind: A significant tailwind during landing can increase the aircraft’s groundspeed, compromising the ability to achieve a safe touchdown and adequate runway length for deceleration.

In such cases, pilots may opt for a rejected landing to mitigate the risks associated with an excessively fast touchdown. 2.

Sudden Gust of Wind: Unexpected gusts of wind during the landing phase can cause an unstable approach, jeopardizing the aircraft’s ability to land within safe parameters. If the pilot feels that wind conditions pose a significant threat to the successful completion of the landing, a rejected landing becomes a prudent choice.

3. Runway Incursion: In critical situations where there is an unauthorized vehicle, aircraft, or obstacle on the runway, pilots will abort the landing attempt and initiate a rejected landing.

Ensuring the safety of both the aircraft and any potential objects on the runway takes priority, preventing potential accidents or collisions.

Published Missed Approach Procedure

Importance and Details of the Published Missed Approach Procedure

The Published Missed Approach Procedure is a crucial element of aviation protocols, providing standardized guidelines for pilots during go-rounds and rejected landings. This set of instructions outlines the lateral track, the vertical profile, and the course of action to be followed in the event of either procedure.

Lateral Track: The published missed approach procedure defines the path that the aircraft is expected to follow after a go-round or rejected landing. This track is designed to ensure safe separation from obstacles, terrain, or other aircraft, guiding pilots to a predetermined point where they can assess the situation and make further decisions.

Vertical Profile: The published missed approach procedure also includes specific altitude requirements for each segment of the missed approach. This aids in maintaining safe vertical separation and helps pilots navigate the airspace while transitioning from the go-round or rejected landing to a stabilized climb.

Minimum Authorized Altitude (MAA): The MAA is a critical component of the published missed approach procedure, establishing the lowest altitude pilots are allowed to descend to during the missed approach. It ensures sufficient obstacle clearance and enhances the overall safety of the operation.

Decision-Making Process After a Go-Round

Following a go-round, pilots are faced with the task of making timely decisions based on the prevailing circumstances. The intricacies and complexity of these decisions make them essential for the safety of all on board.

Some options that pilots consider after a go-round include:

1. Attempting a Second Landing: Depending on the reasons for the initial go-round, the pilot may choose to make a second landing attempt if the factors that prompted the go-round have been mitigated.

This decision is made after a thorough reassessment of runway and environmental conditions, ensuring a higher probability of a safe landing. 2.

Diverting to Another Airport: Sometimes, the conditions that led to a go-round may persist or worsen, making it unsafe or impractical to continue landing attempts. In such cases, pilots may decide to divert to another nearby airport that offers more favorable conditions.

This decision prioritizes the safety of passengers and crew, ensuring a smoother and safer alternative landing location. 3.

Ensuring Safety: Above all, the primary concern for pilots is the safety of all on board. If, at any point during a go-round, the pilot determines that the safest course of action is not attempting a second landing or diverting to another airport, the pilot will follow established procedures to climb to a safe altitude, assess the situation, and communicate with air traffic control to coordinate the next steps.

By adhering to published missed approach procedures and carefully analyzing the options available, pilots ensure that flight operations remain secure even after a go-round, prioritizing the well-being and safety of passengers, crew, and the aircraft itself. In conclusion, understanding the distinction between go-rounds and rejected landings, as well as the steps involved in each procedure, is crucial for comprehending the intricacies of aviation operations.

By exploring the reasons behind initiating a go-round or rejected landing and grasping the intricacies of published missed approach procedures, readers gain valuable insights into the meticulous protocols and decisions faced by pilots. These measures bolster passenger safety and equip pilots with the necessary skills to navigate critical situations in aviation.

In conclusion, understanding the distinction between a go-round and a rejected landing, as well as the procedures involved in each maneuver, is vital for ensuring the safety of aviation operations. By exploring the reasons behind these decisions and implementing published missed approach procedures, pilots prioritize the well-being of passengers, crew, and the aircraft.

The meticulous nature of flight operations, reliance on quick decision-making, and adherence to established protocols highlight the commitment to safety in the aviation industry. So the next time you find yourself on a flight, take comfort in knowing that pilots are well-prepared to handle critical situations, prioritizing your safety above all else.

Popular Posts